TY - JOUR
T1 - A Classification System for Teachers’ Motivational Behaviors Recommended in Self-Determination Theory Interventions
AU - Ahmadi, Asghar
AU - Noetel, Michael
AU - Parker, Philip
AU - Ryan, Richard M.
AU - Ntoumanis, Nikos
AU - Reeve, Johnmarshall
AU - Beauchamp, Mark
AU - Dicke, Theresa
AU - Yeung, Alexander
AU - Ahmadi, Malek
AU - Bartholomew, Kimberley
AU - Chiu, Thomas K.F.
AU - Curran, Thomas
AU - Erturan, Gokce
AU - Flunger, Barbara
AU - Frederick, Christina
AU - Froiland, John Mark
AU - González-Cutre, David
AU - Haerens, Leen
AU - Jeno, Lucas Matias
AU - Koka, Andre
AU - Krijgsman, Christa
AU - Langdon, Jody
AU - White, Rhiannon Lee
AU - Litalien, David
AU - Lubans, David
AU - Mahoney, John
AU - Nalipay, Ma Jenina N.
AU - Patall, Erika
AU - Perlman, Dana
AU - Quested, Eleanor
AU - Schneider, Sascha
AU - Standage, Martyn
AU - Stroet, Kim
AU - Tessier, Damien
AU - Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie
AU - Tilga, Henri
AU - Vasconcellos, Diego
AU - Lonsdale, Chris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Psychological Association
PY - 2023/5/18
Y1 - 2023/5/18
N2 - Teachers’ behavior is a key factor that influences students’ motivation. Many theoretical models have tried to explain this influence, with one of the most thoroughly researched being self-determination theory (SDT). We used a Delphi method to create a classification of teacher behaviors consistent with SDT. This is useful because SDT-based interventions have been widely used to improve educational outcomes. However, these interventions contain many components. Reliably classifying and labeling those components is essential for implementation, reproducibility, and evidence synthesis.We used an international expert panel (N = 34) to develop this classification system. We started by identifying behaviors from existing literature, then refined labels, descriptions, and examples using the Delphi panel’s input. Next, the panel of experts iteratively rated the relevance of each behavior to SDT, the psychological need that each behavior influenced, and its likely effect on motivation. To create a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of behaviors, experts nominated overlapping behaviors that were redundant, and suggested new ones missing from the classification. After three rounds, the expert panel agreed upon 57 teacher motivational behaviors (TMBs) that were consistent with SDT. For most behaviors (77%), experts reached consensus on both the most relevant psychological need and influence on motivation. Our classification system provides a comprehensive list of TMBs and consistent terminology in how those behaviors are labeled. Researchers and practitioners designing interventions could use these behaviors to design interventions, to reproduce interventions, to assess whether these behaviors moderate intervention effects, and could focus new research on areas where experts disagreed.
AB - Teachers’ behavior is a key factor that influences students’ motivation. Many theoretical models have tried to explain this influence, with one of the most thoroughly researched being self-determination theory (SDT). We used a Delphi method to create a classification of teacher behaviors consistent with SDT. This is useful because SDT-based interventions have been widely used to improve educational outcomes. However, these interventions contain many components. Reliably classifying and labeling those components is essential for implementation, reproducibility, and evidence synthesis.We used an international expert panel (N = 34) to develop this classification system. We started by identifying behaviors from existing literature, then refined labels, descriptions, and examples using the Delphi panel’s input. Next, the panel of experts iteratively rated the relevance of each behavior to SDT, the psychological need that each behavior influenced, and its likely effect on motivation. To create a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of behaviors, experts nominated overlapping behaviors that were redundant, and suggested new ones missing from the classification. After three rounds, the expert panel agreed upon 57 teacher motivational behaviors (TMBs) that were consistent with SDT. For most behaviors (77%), experts reached consensus on both the most relevant psychological need and influence on motivation. Our classification system provides a comprehensive list of TMBs and consistent terminology in how those behaviors are labeled. Researchers and practitioners designing interventions could use these behaviors to design interventions, to reproduce interventions, to assess whether these behaviors moderate intervention effects, and could focus new research on areas where experts disagreed.
KW - behavior change techniques
KW - engagement
KW - intervention design
KW - taxonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166975871&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/edu0000783
DO - 10.1037/edu0000783
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166975871
SN - 0022-0663
VL - 115
SP - 1158
EP - 1176
JO - Journal of Educational Psychology
JF - Journal of Educational Psychology
IS - 8
ER -