Abstract
Study compares the effectiveness of state-paid versus offender-paid EM programs used by the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles. The sample consisted of all parolees placed on EM during a 7 month period in 1 999 (n=1 ,516). The follow-up period ranged from 9 to 15 months. Outcomes examined were whether the parolee successfully completed EM, was arrested, or was returned to prison. Regression findings indicated that after control ling for demographic and criminal history characteristics, parolees in the state-funded EM compared to the offender-funded program were more likely to be arrested, but were not more likely to complete EM or return to prison.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| State | Published - Mar 6 2002 |
| Event | Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences annual meeting - Boston, M.A. Duration: Jan 1 2009 → … |
Conference
| Conference | Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences annual meeting |
|---|---|
| Period | 01/1/09 → … |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Disciplines
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Legal Studies
- Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Forensic Science and Technology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of State-funded Versus Offender-funded Electronic Monitoring of Parolees: Examining the Offender-Accountability Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver