A Comparison of the Validity, Predictiveness and Consistency of a Trait Versus Situational Measure of Attributions

John W. Henry, Constance Campbell

Research output: Contribution to book or proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the issues of validity, predictiveness, and consistency of a trait versus situational measure of attributions. Before these types of instruments can be used in organizational settings to select employees and develop training programs, it is necessary to demonstrate their generalizability from research settings to organizational adoption. It is argued in this chapter that this adoption may be premature. Further research should be conducted and the measures refined before they are standardized for use in organizational settings. The results of this study do provide support for past research and show that these instruments do exhibit a relatively high degree of validity and consistency, but their predictive validity is questionable. The results also show that the use of both a general attributional style questionnaire and a situationally based measure can add insight into behavior and performance. The study suggests that both trait and situational measures should be used to predict behavior.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationAttribution Theory
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

DC Disciplines

  • Business Administration, Management, and Operations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of the Validity, Predictiveness and Consistency of a Trait Versus Situational Measure of Attributions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this