Abstract
<div class="line" id="line-39"> Hagan (1990) extended power‐control theory to explain gender differences in vulnerability to crime, a composite of victimization and offending, and the search for deviant role exits. We revisit this elaboration, considering victimization and offending separately, broadening the concept of search for role exits, and including enactment of role exits. Analyses reveal that the model partially explains gender differences in delinquency, but not victimization or the search for role exits. The power‐control variables differentially impact the relationship between gender and role exit behaviour. We conclude that the model promises to improve our understanding of gender differences in behaviours other than crime.</div>
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology |
| Volume | 39 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 14 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Disciplines
- Legal Studies
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Legal Theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Power-Control Theory of Vulnerability to Crime and Adolescent Role Exits - Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver