Abusive supervision: Perception or reality?

Mark J. Martinko, Paul Harvey, David Sikora, Scott C. Douglas

Research output: Contribution to book or proceedingConference articlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Empirical work on the concept of abusive supervision typically employs measurements of subordinates' perceptions of abuse as the primary dependent variable. This study investigates the notion that a significant proportion of subordinates' perceptions of abuse can be explained by individual differences in subordinates' attribution styles and their perceptions of the quality of their LMX relationships. Results indicated that subordinates' hostile attribution styles were positively related to subordinates' perceptions of abuse and that this relationship was mediated by LMX perceptions. Implications of these findings for the study and management of abusive supervision are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAcademy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Event69th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2009 - Chicago, IL, United States
Duration: Aug 7 2009Aug 11 2009

Publication series

NameAcademy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
PublisherAcademy of Management
ISSN (Print)0065-0668

Conference

Conference69th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2009
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityChicago, IL
Period08/7/0908/11/09

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Industrial relations

Keywords

  • Abusive supervision
  • Attributions
  • LMX

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Abusive supervision: Perception or reality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this