Adaptive and maladaptive aspects of self-oriented versus socially prescribed perfectionism

Jeffrey J. Klibert, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Motoko Saito

Research output: Contribution to journalSystematic reviewpeer-review

103 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to examine the extent to which self-oriented versus socially prescribed perfectionism can be differentiated by their correlations with adaptive versus maladaptive constructs (i.e., self-esteem, perceived self-control, achievement motivation, depression, anxiety, suicidal proneness, shame, guilt, and procrastination). Theoretically, socially prescribed perfectionism was expected to be exclusively maladaptive whereas self-oriented perfectionism was expected to have both maladaptive and adaptive characteristics. Participants (n = 475) came from a southeastern university (mean age of 20.9 years, 68% Caucasians). Results indicated that the two types of perfectionism had significantly different correlations with self-esteem, perceived self-control, achievement motivation, depression, anxiety, suicidal proneness, shame, guilt, and procrastination. Generally, socially prescribed perfectionism had stronger associations with maladaptive constructs than did self-oriented perfectionism. In contrast to the assertion that self-oriented perfectionism is exclusively a vulnerability factor (Benson, 2003), and as hypothesized, results indicated that high self-oriented perfectionism in the absence of socially prescribed perfectionism is adaptive. The clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-156
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of College Student Development
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adaptive and maladaptive aspects of self-oriented versus socially prescribed perfectionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this