TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing the practice of public procurement performance measurement
T2 - a framework for conceptualizing efficiency and effectiveness
AU - Boykin, Emily
AU - Lofaro, Ryan J.
AU - McCue, Clifford
AU - Prier, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - IMPACT: This article provides a conceptual, applied framework for public procurement performance measurement. A reimagined systems–theoretical approach reveals a conceptual model by which public managers and policy-makers can understand their current public procurement key performance indicators (KPIs). Focusing on distinctions between the public and private appreciation of efficiency and effectiveness, the model was applied to three European Single Market Scoreboard public procurement KPIs to illustrate where measures tend to fail. Implications from an empirical analysis of aggregated contract notice and award data suggest public procurement performance measures are symbolic indicants rather than true measures of performance unless normalized across the appropriate unit of analysis which are heterogeneous and, in the case of multilevel governance, often have different procurement goals and policy priorities. The model identifies the theoretical challenges facing the metrics used to assess the performance of procurement systems, while acknowledging that, in practice, these metrics may not always be used in isolation for assessment. Recommendations for practice and generalizability across various government regimes and public KPIs are provided.
AB - IMPACT: This article provides a conceptual, applied framework for public procurement performance measurement. A reimagined systems–theoretical approach reveals a conceptual model by which public managers and policy-makers can understand their current public procurement key performance indicators (KPIs). Focusing on distinctions between the public and private appreciation of efficiency and effectiveness, the model was applied to three European Single Market Scoreboard public procurement KPIs to illustrate where measures tend to fail. Implications from an empirical analysis of aggregated contract notice and award data suggest public procurement performance measures are symbolic indicants rather than true measures of performance unless normalized across the appropriate unit of analysis which are heterogeneous and, in the case of multilevel governance, often have different procurement goals and policy priorities. The model identifies the theoretical challenges facing the metrics used to assess the performance of procurement systems, while acknowledging that, in practice, these metrics may not always be used in isolation for assessment. Recommendations for practice and generalizability across various government regimes and public KPIs are provided.
KW - Contracting
KW - Empirical Descriptivism
KW - European Union
KW - Performance Measurement
KW - Public Management
KW - Public Procurement
KW - Single Market Scoreboard
KW - Systems Theory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196293949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09540962.2024.2361832
DO - 10.1080/09540962.2024.2361832
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85196293949
SN - 0954-0962
JO - Public Money and Management
JF - Public Money and Management
ER -