TY - JOUR
T1 - An alternative approach to relapse analysis
T2 - Using Monte Carlo methods and proportional rates of response
AU - Friedel, Jonathan E.
AU - Galizio, Ann
AU - Berry, Meredith S.
AU - Sweeney, Mary M.
AU - Odum, Amy L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
PY - 2019/3
Y1 - 2019/3
N2 - Relapse is the recovery of a previously suppressed response. Animal models have been useful in examining the mechanisms underlying relapse (e.g., reinstatement, renewal, reacquisition, resurgence). However, there are several challenges to analyzing relapse data using traditional approaches. For example, null hypothesis significance testing is commonly used to determine whether relapse has occurred. However, this method requires several a priori assumptions about the data, as well as a large sample size for between-subjects comparisons or repeated testing for within-subjects comparisons. Monte Carlo methods may represent an improved analytic technique, because these methods require no prior assumptions, permit smaller sample sizes, and can be tailored to account for all of the data from an experiment instead of some limited set. In the present study, we conducted reanalyses of three studies of relapse (Berry, Sweeney, & Odum,; Galizio et al.,; Odum & Shahan,) using Monte Carlo techniques to determine if relapse occurred and if there were differences in rate of response based on relevant independent variables (such as group membership or schedule of reinforcement). These reanalyses supported the previous findings. Finally, we provide general recommendations for using Monte Carlo methods in studies of relapse.
AB - Relapse is the recovery of a previously suppressed response. Animal models have been useful in examining the mechanisms underlying relapse (e.g., reinstatement, renewal, reacquisition, resurgence). However, there are several challenges to analyzing relapse data using traditional approaches. For example, null hypothesis significance testing is commonly used to determine whether relapse has occurred. However, this method requires several a priori assumptions about the data, as well as a large sample size for between-subjects comparisons or repeated testing for within-subjects comparisons. Monte Carlo methods may represent an improved analytic technique, because these methods require no prior assumptions, permit smaller sample sizes, and can be tailored to account for all of the data from an experiment instead of some limited set. In the present study, we conducted reanalyses of three studies of relapse (Berry, Sweeney, & Odum,; Galizio et al.,; Odum & Shahan,) using Monte Carlo techniques to determine if relapse occurred and if there were differences in rate of response based on relevant independent variables (such as group membership or schedule of reinforcement). These reanalyses supported the previous findings. Finally, we provide general recommendations for using Monte Carlo methods in studies of relapse.
KW - bootstrapping
KW - Monte Carlo
KW - null hypothesis significance testing
KW - reinstatement
KW - relapse
KW - renewal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058712778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jeab.489
DO - 10.1002/jeab.489
M3 - Article
C2 - 30556581
AN - SCOPUS:85058712778
SN - 0022-5002
VL - 111
SP - 289
EP - 308
JO - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
JF - Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
IS - 2
ER -