An Examination of the Use of Computer-Based Formative Assessments

Patrick Sullivan, Juliann Sergi McBrayer, Suzanne Miller, Katherine E. Fallon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Presentation given at Georgia Educational Research Association Conference (GERA).

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current usage rates, training in, and perceptions of computer-based formative assessments (CBFA) by educators in a one-to-one computing environment. This quantitative study utilized a collection of survey data from 261 academic, K-12 teachers in a mid-sized suburban school district. Findings supported previous research noting that in one-to-one computing settings, educator’s attitudes and internal beliefs influence the rate of technology usage as a tool to advance student learning. Findings noted that teacher perceived comfort levels with technology, former beliefs regarding technology is the classroom, and teacher’s perceived autonomy impacted the readiness to use and implementation of CBFAs in the classroom environment. More specifically, findings uncovered significant differences within teacher usage of CBFA by teaching grade level, class levels, and study subjects. These findings support the need for targeted purposeful, collaborative, and sustainable professional development activities to encourage use of CBFA within the classroom to aide in student achievement. Further, additional research on a wider, national spread, long-term evaluations of usage, and effectiveness of increased CBFA usage on student achievement will assist in a more comprehensive understanding of the benefits of CBFA in the classroom.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalGeorgia Educational Research Association Conference (GERA)
StatePublished - Oct 2 2020

DC Disciplines

  • Educational Administration and Supervision
  • Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
  • Educational Leadership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An Examination of the Use of Computer-Based Formative Assessments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this