BALANCING THE HARMS: The Ethics of Sentencing and Punishment

Laurie A. Gould, Daniel J. Lytle

Research output: Contribution to book or proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter examines the purposes of criminal sentencing and punishment including deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, and rehabilitation. A variety of issues will be explored including, disparities in criminal punishment and sentencing, the role of prediction in the assignment of criminal penalties, and whether allowing inmates to earn "good time" is a good sentencing policy. Additionally, the unintended consequences of an overreliance on prisons for punishment are also explored.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJustice, Crime, and Ethics, 11th Edition
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages174-194
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781000823608
ISBN (Print)9781032379760
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Social Sciences

Keywords

  • Desert
  • Deterrence
  • False Negative
  • False Positive
  • General Deterrence
  • Hedonistic Calculus
  • Incapacitation
  • Proportionality
  • Punishment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Retribution
  • Specific Deterrence
  • Truth in Sentencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BALANCING THE HARMS: The Ethics of Sentencing and Punishment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this