Beachgoers’ responses to beach health advisories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Drawing on responses from 238 beachgoers who have visited a Georgia (U.S. state) beach in the past three years, this study asks respondents about their knowledge of beach water quality monitoring, awareness of beach health advisories, perception of water quality, and expected responses upon learning of a beach’s water pollution advisory. Binomial logistic regression finds that the only demographic predictor of respondents who would completely stop visiting a beach with an advisory is whether the respondent is a visitor or resident (year-round or part-time). Nearly 40% of visitors would not come to a beach with an advisory compared to 13.4% of residents. Most respondents report they would continue to visit a beach but would stay out of the water and stop harvesting seafood from the beach’s waters. More than a third (36.1%), however, are unaware Georgia regularly monitors beach water for water quality, and 41.2% have never read a beach sign warning of contaminated water or seafood. Alarmingly, just over half view aesthetic factors such as no litter, no odor, and clear water as criteria for defining whether beach water is safe.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)565-571
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Water and Health
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2024

Keywords

  • Georgia
  • advisories
  • beaches
  • pollution
  • warnings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beachgoers’ responses to beach health advisories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this