Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited

Alexander L. Burton, Francis T. Cullen, Velmer S. Burton, Amanda Graham, Leah C. Butler, Angela J. Thielo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

53 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability is negatively related to punitive attitudes. In addition, the analyses reveal that this belief predicts support for rehabilitation and specific inclusionary policies (i.e., ban-the-box in employment, expungement of criminal records, and voting rights for people with a felony conviction). Findings regarding measures for punishment and rehabilitation were confirmed by a 2019 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) survey. These results suggest that beliefs about capacity for change among people who committed offenses are key to understanding crime-control public policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)712-732
Number of pages21
JournalCriminal Justice and Behavior
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2020

Keywords

  • attitudes
  • corrections
  • public opinion
  • punitiveness
  • redeemability
  • rehabilitation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this