Abstract
In 2009, Maruna and King presented results from a British survey showing that the public’s belief in the redeemability of people who committed offenses curbed their level of punitiveness. Based on a 2017 national survey in the United States (n = 1,000), the current study confirms that redeemability is negatively related to punitive attitudes. In addition, the analyses reveal that this belief predicts support for rehabilitation and specific inclusionary policies (i.e., ban-the-box in employment, expungement of criminal records, and voting rights for people with a felony conviction). Findings regarding measures for punishment and rehabilitation were confirmed by a 2019 Mechanical Turk (MTurk) survey. These results suggest that beliefs about capacity for change among people who committed offenses are key to understanding crime-control public policy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 712-732 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Criminal Justice and Behavior |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Scopus Subject Areas
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine
- General Psychology
- Law
Keywords
- attitudes
- corrections
- public opinion
- punitiveness
- redeemability
- rehabilitation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Belief in Redeemability and Punitive Public Opinion: “Once a Criminal, Always a Criminal” Revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver