Body, Mind, and Soul in the Gulf War Debate

Francis A. Beer, Barry J. Balleck

Research output: Contribution to book or proceedingChapter

Abstract

When the stakes of public words and actions are global and permanent, and especially when they involve war and peace, can we afford not to seek their meaning? For three decades, Francis Beer has pioneered the effort to discover, describe, and connect pieces of the complex puzzle of war, peace, their interrelationship, and their causes.

In this volume, Beer (joined by colleagues as co-authors of some chapters) examines the cognitive, behavioral, and linguistic dimensions of war and peace. Language, he shows, is important because it mediates between thought and action. It expresses beliefs about war and peace and affects the perceptions of potential adversaries about one's own intentions. Using multiple perspectives and methods, he explores the uses of communication in international relations and the development of "meaning" for war and peace.

In this unique and innovative post-realist analysis, Beer examines how language transmits and creates meaning through interaction with specific audiences. His case studies include the Somalian intervention, Sarajevo and the Balkan conflict, and the Gulf War. Moving beyond the discrete words of war, the book takes a broader view of how political participants interact in war and peace through continuous streams of communication that reflect and construct worlds of meaning. This stimulating and challenging volume brings together insights and evidence from political science, cognitive psychology, linguistics, history, and rhetorical studies and applies them in a focused way to the problem of war and peace.

Original languageAmerican English
Title of host publicationMeanings of War and Peace
StatePublished - Jun 1 2001

DC Disciplines

  • International Relations
  • Political Science
  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Body, Mind, and Soul in the Gulf War Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this