Child proportional scaling: Is 1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

The current experiments examined the role of scale factor in children's proportional reasoning. Experiment 1 used a choice task and Experiment 2 used a production task to examine the abilities of kindergartners through fourth-graders to match equivalent, visually depicted proportional relations. The findings of both experiments show that accuracy decreased as the scaling magnitude between the equivalent proportions increased. In addition, children's errors showed that the cost of scaling proportional relations is symmetrical for problems that involve scaling up and scaling down. These findings indicate that scaling has a cognitive cost that results in decreasing performance with increasing scaling magnitude. These scale factor effects are consistent with children's use of intuitive strategies to solve proportional reasoning problems that may be important in scaffolding more formal mathematical understanding of proportional relations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)516-533
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume111
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2012

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Keywords

  • Mathematical development
  • Mental transformation
  • Numerical reasoning
  • Proportional reasoning
  • Relative scaling
  • Spatial cognition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Child proportional scaling: Is 1/3=2/6=3/9=4/12?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this