Chromosomal basis of viability differences in Tigriopus californicus interpopulation hybrids

J. S. Harrison, S. Edmands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Crosses between populations of Tigriopus californicus result in backcross and F2 hybrid breakdown for a variety of fitness related measures. The magnitude of this hybrid breakdown is correlated with evolutionary divergence. We assessed the chromosomal basis of viability differences in nonrecombinant backcross hybrids using markers mapped to individual chromosomes. To assess effects of evolutionary divergence we crossed one population to three different populations: two distantly related (∼18% mitochondrial COI sequence divergence) and one closely related (∼1% mitochondrial COI sequence divergence). We found that all three interpopulation crosses resulted in significant deviations from expected Mendelian ratios at a majority of the loci studied. In all but one case, deviations were due to a deficit of parental homozygotes. This pattern implies that populations of T. californicus carry a significant genetic load, and that a combination of beneficial dominance and deleterious homozygote-heterozygote interactions significantly affects hybrid viability. Pairwise tests of linkage disequilibrium detected relatively few significant interactions. For the two divergent crosses, effects of individual chromosomes were highly concordant. These two crosses also showed higher heterozygote excess in females than males across the vast majority of chromosomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2040-2051
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Evolutionary Biology
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Keywords

  • Dominance
  • Epistasis
  • Hybrid
  • Tigriopus californicus
  • Viability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chromosomal basis of viability differences in Tigriopus californicus interpopulation hybrids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this