Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf.: Annual conference of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association.

Vishakha Rawool; Chitre, A

Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf. Annual conference of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association.

Clinical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to conference › Presentation › peer-review

Abstract

Eight congenitally deaf 6–9 yr olds were tested to determine which approach—visual, auditory, or audiovisual—was most effective in helping them learn the discrimination of monosyllabic words. The speech material was comprised of the numbers from 1 to 6 and from 8 to 10. Ss were instructed to watch the lip movements of the experimenter (visual approach), to listen to the word through a hearing aid (auditory approach), or both (audiovisual approach) and to present the appropriate number card. Presentation trials continued until each S responded correctly for 3 consecutive trials. Results show that the unisensory approaches (visual and auditory) were more effective than the audiovisual approach. (4 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Original language	American English
State	Published - Jan 1975
Event	Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf: Annual conference of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association - Banglore, India Duration: Jan 1 1975 → Jan 1 1975

Conference

Conference	Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf
Country/Territory	India
City	Banglore
Period	01/1/75 → 01/1/75

Scopus Subject Areas

Health Professions (all)

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Keywords

auditory
Auditory visual
hearing loss
Visual

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1983-26309-001

Cite this

@conference{272d0875049d4d4a956b112c0efb9603,

title = "Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf.: Annual conference of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association.",

abstract = "Eight congenitally deaf 6–9 yr olds were tested to determine which approach—visual, auditory, or audiovisual—was most effective in helping them learn the discrimination of monosyllabic words. The speech material was comprised of the numbers from 1 to 6 and from 8 to 10. Ss were instructed to watch the lip movements of the experimenter (visual approach), to listen to the word through a hearing aid (auditory approach), or both (audiovisual approach) and to present the appropriate number card. Presentation trials continued until each S responded correctly for 3 consecutive trials. Results show that the unisensory approaches (visual and auditory) were more effective than the audiovisual approach. (4 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)",

keywords = "auditory, Auditory visual, hearing loss, Visual",

author = "Vishakha Rawool and \{Chitre, A\}",

year = "1975",

month = jan,

language = "American English",

note = "Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf : Annual conference of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association ; Conference date: 01-01-1975 Through 01-01-1975",

}

Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf. Annual conference of the Indian Speech and Hearing Association. / Rawool, Vishakha; Chitre, A.
1975. Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf, Banglore, India.

Research output: Contribution to conference › Presentation › peer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf.

T2 - Comparison of the audio-visual, auditory, and visual approaches in rehabilitation of the deaf

AU - Rawool, Vishakha

AU - Chitre, A

PY - 1975/1

Y1 - 1975/1

N2 - Eight congenitally deaf 6–9 yr olds were tested to determine which approach—visual, auditory, or audiovisual—was most effective in helping them learn the discrimination of monosyllabic words. The speech material was comprised of the numbers from 1 to 6 and from 8 to 10. Ss were instructed to watch the lip movements of the experimenter (visual approach), to listen to the word through a hearing aid (auditory approach), or both (audiovisual approach) and to present the appropriate number card. Presentation trials continued until each S responded correctly for 3 consecutive trials. Results show that the unisensory approaches (visual and auditory) were more effective than the audiovisual approach. (4 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

AB - Eight congenitally deaf 6–9 yr olds were tested to determine which approach—visual, auditory, or audiovisual—was most effective in helping them learn the discrimination of monosyllabic words. The speech material was comprised of the numbers from 1 to 6 and from 8 to 10. Ss were instructed to watch the lip movements of the experimenter (visual approach), to listen to the word through a hearing aid (auditory approach), or both (audiovisual approach) and to present the appropriate number card. Presentation trials continued until each S responded correctly for 3 consecutive trials. Results show that the unisensory approaches (visual and auditory) were more effective than the audiovisual approach. (4 ref) (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

KW - auditory

KW - Auditory visual

KW - hearing loss

KW - Visual

M3 - Presentation

Y2 - 1 January 1975 through 1 January 1975

ER -