Abstract
The USA education policy, "Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965" (ESEA), is analyzed for its inherent contradictions to and opportunities for peace education and educators. This research is based in dialectic, critical and discursive methods. After defining peace education, it traces the history, support and critiques of ESEA, including the reauthorization, "No Child Left Behind," and President Obama’s "ESEA Reauthorization: A Blueprint for Reform." The points of uncertainty or contradiction for peace education are described. Then the aspects of ESEA that corroborate the foundations and goals of peace education are highlighted. Finally, this research considers the peace-related programs in elementary and secondary schools and teacher training, as well as additional ideas for future initiatives that can prosper within ESEA.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| State | Published - 2012 |
| Event | American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) - Duration: Apr 15 2018 → … |
Conference
| Conference | American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) |
|---|---|
| Period | 04/15/18 → … |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Disciplines
- Education
- Curriculum and Instruction
Keywords
- Contradictions
- Critical analysis
- Elementary education
- Opportunities
- Peace education
- Secondary education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Contradictions and Opportunities for Peace Education: Critical Analysis of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver