Death, actually: Emboldening theory and praxis when death is all around

Patricia M. Patterson, Ryan J. Lofaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we seek to illuminate the public sector relevance of the weighty subject of death, and to identify the stakes in avoiding the subject. Our purpose is to unlearn silence about Public Administration’s (PA’s) potential role in understanding, communicating, and addressing the avoidable and unavoidable in human death and suffering. At this time, death seems to be all around, and at the same time, nowhere. Contending that the academic field of PA understates the degree to which death features in actual PA practice, this article establishes death’s relative absence in the journals of the field before examining obstacles to its presence. We identify and critically examine potential barriers to death’s inclusion in PA, suggesting ways forward and intimating that COVID-born openness to recognition and discussion of death is not likely to last without conscious efforts. In illuminating objections and stakes we propose that PA theory and praxis and the public sector itself would benefit by confronting death avoidance, anxiety, and dread with greater and more intentional reflection, deliberation, and literacy on these subjects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-34
Number of pages22
JournalAdministrative Theory and Praxis
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Death denial
  • death avoidance
  • emotional labor
  • epidemics
  • mortality
  • role of government
  • terror management theory
  • theory and praxis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Death, actually: Emboldening theory and praxis when death is all around'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this