Defining economic and environmental typologies across 77 countries to prioritize opportunities for non-sewered sanitation

Hannah Lohman, Yalin Li, Xinyi Zhang, Victoria Morgan, Shion Watabe, Lewis Stetson Rowles, Roland Cusick, Jeremy Guest

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Lack of access to sanitation is a challenge that persists globally, with low sewerage connection rates in many low and lower-middle income countries. Engineered non-sewered sanitation (NSS) technologies can meet treatment requirements without sewers, but their relative sustainability varies across potential deployment sites. Here, we characterize the costs and carbon intensity (CI) of three emerging NSS technologies – two community reinvented toilets (CRTs) and one Omni Processor (OP) – across 77 countries, identify sustainability performance typologies, and map typology prevalence in countries across the globe. Locality-specific factors such as wages, diet, and material costs drive regional variability in NSS costs by up to 15-fold and CI up to 2-fold within technologies. Across all three NSS technologies and all scenarios evaluated, costs ranged from 0.01 to 0.36 USD·capita-1·day-1 and CIs ranged from 8 to 269 kg CO2 eq·capita-1·year-1. Low-cost, low-CI typologies are predominantly in countries with lower human development indices (HDI 2-4), demonstrating alignment between sanitation need and the NSS opportunity space. Ultimately, the intent of this work is not to imply one-size-fits-all solutions for individual countries; by elucidating key sustainability drivers and defining typologies, this work can support early-stage decision-making for NSS technology research, development, and deployment.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherCambridge University Press
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 20 2025

Keywords

  • non-sewered sanitation (NSS)
  • decentralized wastewater treatment
  • greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
  • techno-economic analysis (TEA)
  • life cycle assessment (LCA)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining economic and environmental typologies across 77 countries to prioritize opportunities for non-sewered sanitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this