Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts

Nancy Scherer, Brett Curry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations

Abstract

In the past two decades, numerous studies have tested empirically the normative theory of descriptive race representation. Here, we focus specifically on one aspect of descriptive representationthe relationship between increased racial representation and institutional legitimacy. Does greater racial diversity within a political institution increase its reservoir of good will? Using a novel experimental design centered on the federal courts, we find that greater descriptive representation for blacks causes increased legitimacy for the institution among African Americans. However, we also find that white support declines under the same experimental condition. In probing our data further, we discover that increased diversity does not impact blacks and whites in the same manner across the ideological spectrum. Rather, a person's ideology mediates how he or she assesses racial diversity on the bench. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume72
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Keywords

  • Conservatism
  • Federal courts
  • Judges
  • Liberalism
  • Political institutions
  • Political representation
  • Racial diversity
  • Statistical significance
  • White people

DC Disciplines

  • American Politics
  • Political Science
  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this