TY - JOUR
T1 - Educational leadership doctoral faculty academic qualifications and practitioner experiences in Georgia
AU - Tolman, Steven
AU - McBrayer, Juliann Sergi
AU - Evans, Deborah
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Informing Science Institute. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Aim/Purpose This study examined doctoral faculty of educational leadership within the state of Georgia in the United States. The aim was to illustrate the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of the faculty that develop students in educational leadership programs to be scholarly practitioners and future educational leaders. Background Faculty of educational leadership programs prepare their students to hold imminent senior leadership roles in P-12 school administration and higher education administration. In this apprenticeship model, doctoral faculty utilize their academic qualifications and/or practitioner experiences to develop students into scholarly practitioners. Methodology A descriptive quantitative study utilizing content analysis was conducted to examine faculty of doctoral programs in educational leadership (n=83). True to this methodology, the inquiry of this study sought to better understand the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of doctoral faculty in the field of educational leadership. Contribution This study serves as a primer for faculty and researchers to visualize the doctoral faculty of educational leadership programs. It can serve as a catalyst to encourage empirical studies of educational leadership faculty and their effectiveness in preparing scholarly practitioners. Findings Key findings included that nearly 2/3 of the faculty have their terminal degrees from a Research 1 institution, 3/5 hold a PhD, and 3/4 have practitioner experience in their respective field. Recommendations Doctoral programs should examine the diversity of the academic qualifi-for Practitioners cations and practitioner experiences of their faculty and develop strategies to enhance their programs with these complimenting skill sets. Recommendation Descriptive studies effectively “dip our toe” into a new area of inquiry. for Researchers Considerations for future research includes examining student perceptions of their faculty who hold either a PhD or Ed.D, as well as those who are academics versus practitioners to better understand their effectiveness. Impact on Society True to the work of John Dewey, education serves as the vehicle to promote a democratic society. Recognizing these doctoral faculty are preparing the future leaders of education, understanding the experiences of faculty will allow for better insight into those who are ultimately shaping the future of education. Future Research Future research should focus on empirical studies that explore the effectiveness of faculty based on their academic qualifications and practitioner experiences through the lens of student perceptions.
AB - Aim/Purpose This study examined doctoral faculty of educational leadership within the state of Georgia in the United States. The aim was to illustrate the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of the faculty that develop students in educational leadership programs to be scholarly practitioners and future educational leaders. Background Faculty of educational leadership programs prepare their students to hold imminent senior leadership roles in P-12 school administration and higher education administration. In this apprenticeship model, doctoral faculty utilize their academic qualifications and/or practitioner experiences to develop students into scholarly practitioners. Methodology A descriptive quantitative study utilizing content analysis was conducted to examine faculty of doctoral programs in educational leadership (n=83). True to this methodology, the inquiry of this study sought to better understand the academic qualifications and practitioner experiences of doctoral faculty in the field of educational leadership. Contribution This study serves as a primer for faculty and researchers to visualize the doctoral faculty of educational leadership programs. It can serve as a catalyst to encourage empirical studies of educational leadership faculty and their effectiveness in preparing scholarly practitioners. Findings Key findings included that nearly 2/3 of the faculty have their terminal degrees from a Research 1 institution, 3/5 hold a PhD, and 3/4 have practitioner experience in their respective field. Recommendations Doctoral programs should examine the diversity of the academic qualifi-for Practitioners cations and practitioner experiences of their faculty and develop strategies to enhance their programs with these complimenting skill sets. Recommendation Descriptive studies effectively “dip our toe” into a new area of inquiry. for Researchers Considerations for future research includes examining student perceptions of their faculty who hold either a PhD or Ed.D, as well as those who are academics versus practitioners to better understand their effectiveness. Impact on Society True to the work of John Dewey, education serves as the vehicle to promote a democratic society. Recognizing these doctoral faculty are preparing the future leaders of education, understanding the experiences of faculty will allow for better insight into those who are ultimately shaping the future of education. Future Research Future research should focus on empirical studies that explore the effectiveness of faculty based on their academic qualifications and practitioner experiences through the lens of student perceptions.
KW - Academic qualifications
KW - Doctor of Education
KW - Doctoral faculty
KW - Educational leadership
KW - Practitioner experiences
KW - Scholarly practitioners
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061933290&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.28945/4179
DO - 10.28945/4179
M3 - Article
SN - 1556-8881
VL - 14
SP - 85
EP - 104
JO - International Journal of Doctoral Studies
JF - International Journal of Doctoral Studies
ER -