Effectiveness of a digital weight management program on diet quality: a randomized controlled trial

Ana M. Palacios, Alexandra M. Lee, Chelsie Parker, Cullun Q. Watts, Stephanie L. Dickinson, Beate Henschel, Grace Anderson, Jing X. Kersey, David B. Allison, Gary D. Foster, Michelle I. Cardel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The effect of behavioral commercial weight programs (CP) on weight loss is clear, yet their effects on diet quality are less studied. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the relative effectiveness of a digital CP on diet quality compared with standard nutritional guidance (SNG) over 6 months. Methods: This randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov/NCT05648344) included 376 United States adults with a body mass index of 27–45 kg/m2 and a self-reported desire to lose weight. Participants were randomly assigned to a 6-month digital, behavioral CP (WeightWatchers) (n = 187) or to SNG (n = 189). SNG participants received a monthly email with information from the United States Department of Agriculture MyPlate.gov. The primary outcome was the between-group, 6-month difference in diet quality (Healthy-Eating Index, HEI-2020) calculated from 3 24-h dietary recalls gathered with the Automated Self-Administered 24-h Dietary Assessment Tool. Secondary outcomes included percent weight loss and weight-loss milestones of 3%, 5%, and 10%. Intention-to-treat, 6-month differences between CP and SNG were compared with analysis of covariance or logistic regressions with multiple imputation adjusted for sex, age, race, ethnicity, education, and baseline values. Results: Participant's mean age was 47.7 years (standard deviation = 12); 65.7% self-identified as non-Hispanic White, 20.7% as male, and 17.8% experienced food insecurity. Improvements in mean HEI were significantly greater with CP, 5.3 (standard error = 1.5), than SNG, 1.1 (1.4); between-group mean difference 4.2 (1.2); 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.8, 6.6. CP participants lost significantly more % body weight, –5.4% (0.9), than SNG participants, –1.5% (0.8); mean difference –3.9% (0.7); 95% CI: –5.4, –2.5. Odds ratios for achieving 3%, 5%, and 10% weight loss for CP compared with SNG participants were 2.7 (95% CI: 1.7, 4.2), 3.3 (95% CI: 2.1, 5.4), and 7.1 (95% CI: 3.2, 15.8), respectively. Conclusions: A CP was significantly more effective than SNG for improving diet quality and weight loss among a diverse sample of adults living with overweight or obesity in the United States. Trial registration number: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05648344.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)830-840
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume122
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Keywords

  • HEI-2020
  • Healthy-Eating Index
  • WeightWatchers
  • adults
  • behavioral intervention
  • lifestyle
  • obesity
  • overweight

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of a digital weight management program on diet quality: a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this