Effects of two instructional approaches on skill development, knowledge, and game performance

Tony Pritchard, Andrew Hawkins, Robert Wiegand, Jonathan N. Metzler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two instructional approaches that have been of interest in promoting sport have been the Sport Education Model (SEM) and the Traditional Style (TS) of teaching physical education. The purpose of this study was to investigate how SEM and TS would affect skill development, knowledge, and game performance for volleyball at the secondary level. A 2 × 3 (group × time) research design was utilized on 47 secondary students testing volleyball skills, knowledge, and game performance. Participants were placed in either the SEM or the TS via stratified randomization, and then were tested pre, mid, and post intervention through the 20-lesson volleyball unit. The 2 × 3 repeated measures Analysis of Variances (ANOVAs) with Bonferroni correction revealed no significant difference between models for skills and knowledge, but there was for game performance for group [F(1, 45) = 10.27, p < .008, η2 = .19], time [F(2, 90) = 8.62, p < .008, η2 = .16], and group × time interaction [F(2, 90) = 8.43, p < .008, η2 = .16]. If the goal of the physical education program is to promote quality game play, the SEM may be more effective than the TS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-236
Number of pages18
JournalMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • Physical education
  • Sport education
  • Teaching
  • Volleyball

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of two instructional approaches on skill development, knowledge, and game performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this