Emerging investigator series: are we undervaluing septage? Rethinking septage management for nutrient recovery and environmental protection

Kevin D. Orner, Lewis S. Rowles, Sara Heger, Ben Howard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

An estimated 20-25% percent of households in the US rely on on-site sanitation via septic tanks to manage their wastewater. Septage management strategies such as land application, treatment at wastewater treatment plants, and treatment at independent septage treatment plants are common regulated and protective processes for managing septage. There can, however, be potentially negative environmental impacts such as groundwater contamination if septic systems are failing or improperly designed. In this perspective, we reimagine septage management at each step of the septage value chain, identify barriers to change, and propose solutions to overcome these existing barriers. Reimagined septage management can take both high-level and context-specific approaches, including upgrading or retrofitting older septic takes to be impermeable and promoting proper tank pumping intervals, short transport distances, resource recovery, and safe reuse. These solutions could improve economic, environmental, and social sustainability over the status quo. Barriers such as lack of comprehensive data, aspects of decentralized regulation and management, public perception, and impacts of climate change can be overcome via policy best practices, increased stakeholder engagement, improved data collection, integration of machine learning, and climate change adaptation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironmental Science: Water Research and Technology
DOIs
StatePublished - May 23 2025

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Water Science and Technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emerging investigator series: are we undervaluing septage? Rethinking septage management for nutrient recovery and environmental protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this