TY - JOUR
T1 - Emerging technologies with potential for objectively evaluating speech recognition skills
AU - Rawool, Vishakha Waman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society.
PY - 2016/2/12
Y1 - 2016/2/12
N2 - Work-related exposure to noise and other ototoxins can cause damage to the cochlea, synapses between the inner hair cells, the auditory nerve fibers, and higher auditory pathways, leading to difficulties in recognizing speech. Procedures designed to determine speech recognition scores (SRS) in an objective manner can be helpful in disability compensation cases where the worker claims to have poor speech perception due to exposure to noise or ototoxins. Such measures can also be helpful in determining SRS in individuals who cannot provide reliable responses to speech stimuli, including patients with Alzheimers disease, traumatic brain injuries, and infants with and without hearing loss. Cost-effective neural monitoring hardware and software is being rapidly refined due to the high demand for neurogaming (games involving the use of brain-computer interfaces), health, and other applications. More specifically, two related advances in neuro-technology include relative ease in recording neural activity and availability of sophisticated analysing techniques. These techniques are reviewed in the current article and their applications for developing objective SRS procedures are proposed. Issues related to neuroaudioethics (ethics related to collection of neural data evoked by auditory stimuli including speech) and neurosecurity (preservation of a persons neural mechanisms and free will) are also discussed.
AB - Work-related exposure to noise and other ototoxins can cause damage to the cochlea, synapses between the inner hair cells, the auditory nerve fibers, and higher auditory pathways, leading to difficulties in recognizing speech. Procedures designed to determine speech recognition scores (SRS) in an objective manner can be helpful in disability compensation cases where the worker claims to have poor speech perception due to exposure to noise or ototoxins. Such measures can also be helpful in determining SRS in individuals who cannot provide reliable responses to speech stimuli, including patients with Alzheimers disease, traumatic brain injuries, and infants with and without hearing loss. Cost-effective neural monitoring hardware and software is being rapidly refined due to the high demand for neurogaming (games involving the use of brain-computer interfaces), health, and other applications. More specifically, two related advances in neuro-technology include relative ease in recording neural activity and availability of sophisticated analysing techniques. These techniques are reviewed in the current article and their applications for developing objective SRS procedures are proposed. Issues related to neuroaudioethics (ethics related to collection of neural data evoked by auditory stimuli including speech) and neurosecurity (preservation of a persons neural mechanisms and free will) are also discussed.
KW - auditory evoked fields
KW - auditory evoked potentials
KW - electroencephalography
KW - magnetoencephalography
KW - neural networks
KW - neuroaudioethics
KW - neurosecurity
KW - Speech processing
KW - speech recognition scores
KW - stimulus reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957055068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/14992027.2015.1128570
DO - 10.3109/14992027.2015.1128570
M3 - Article
C2 - 26807789
AN - SCOPUS:84957055068
SN - 1499-2027
VL - 55
SP - S41-S50
JO - International Journal of Audiology
JF - International Journal of Audiology
ER -