Abstract
<p> Outlines alternative research strategies for evaluation of Community policing (CP). Briefly discusses the failure of policing as a formal mechanism of social control and traces the evolution of CP. Identifies features which provide a paradigm for CP. Gives lists of objectives to determine whether CP is being implemented and is successful. Compares methods of data collection. Examines two types of quasi‐experimental designs for evaluation: pre‐test/post‐test group or interrupted time‐series design. Proposes causal‐comparative research as an alternative to these designs.</p>
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Police Studies: An International Review |
| Volume | 18 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Disciplines
- Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Legal Studies
- Social and Behavioral Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating Community Policing: Problems and Prospects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver