TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Work Efficiency in Structural Firefighters
AU - Langford, Emily L.
AU - Bergstrom, Haley C.
AU - Lanham, Sarah
AU - Eastman, Alyssa Q.
AU - Best, Stuart
AU - Ma, Xin
AU - Mason, Mark R.
AU - Abel, Mark G.
N1 - Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
PY - 2023/11/28
Y1 - 2023/11/28
N2 - Langford, EL, Bergstrom, HC, Lanham, S, Eastman, AQ, Best, S, Ma, X, Mason, MR, and Abel, MG. Evaluation of work efficiency in structural firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): 2457-2466, 2023 - To perform occupational tasks safely and effectively, firefighters (FF) must work quickly and consume air provided by the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) efficiently. However, most literature only factors work rate into performance, neglecting the inherent time limitation imposed by the SCBA. The purpose of this article was to (a) evaluate the reliability and variability in a "work efficiency" (WE) performance metric reflective of both work rate and air consumption; (b) explore the relationship between WE and established measures of metabolic strain; and (c) identify fitness, anthropometric, and demographic correlates of WE. About 79 structural FF completed an air consumption drill while breathing through an SCBA. Self-paced work duration and air consumption were entered into the WE equation. A subsample of FF (n = 44) completed another randomized trial while breathing through a portable gas analyzer. Anthropometric and fitness data were collected separately. Correlations were performed between WE vs. fitness, anthropometric, demographic, and metabolic outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the strongest predictors of WE. WE was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71) and yielded inter-FF variability {0.79 ± 0.25 ([lb·in-2·min]-1) × 104; coefficient of variation = 31.6%}. WE was positively correlated to oxygen consumption (VO2) (L·minute-1, mL·kg-1·minute-1) and tidal volume and negatively correlated to VE/VO2and respiratory frequency. Height, upper-body endurance, and aerobic endurance were identified as the strongest predictors of WE (adjusted R2= 0.59, RMSE = 0.16). WE is a reliable and occupationally relevant method to assess FF performance because it accounts for work rate and air consumption. Firefighters may enhance WE through a training intervention focused on improving metabolic tolerance, upper-body endurance, and aerobic endurance.
AB - Langford, EL, Bergstrom, HC, Lanham, S, Eastman, AQ, Best, S, Ma, X, Mason, MR, and Abel, MG. Evaluation of work efficiency in structural firefighters. J Strength Cond Res 37(12): 2457-2466, 2023 - To perform occupational tasks safely and effectively, firefighters (FF) must work quickly and consume air provided by the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) efficiently. However, most literature only factors work rate into performance, neglecting the inherent time limitation imposed by the SCBA. The purpose of this article was to (a) evaluate the reliability and variability in a "work efficiency" (WE) performance metric reflective of both work rate and air consumption; (b) explore the relationship between WE and established measures of metabolic strain; and (c) identify fitness, anthropometric, and demographic correlates of WE. About 79 structural FF completed an air consumption drill while breathing through an SCBA. Self-paced work duration and air consumption were entered into the WE equation. A subsample of FF (n = 44) completed another randomized trial while breathing through a portable gas analyzer. Anthropometric and fitness data were collected separately. Correlations were performed between WE vs. fitness, anthropometric, demographic, and metabolic outcomes. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the strongest predictors of WE. WE was reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.71) and yielded inter-FF variability {0.79 ± 0.25 ([lb·in-2·min]-1) × 104; coefficient of variation = 31.6%}. WE was positively correlated to oxygen consumption (VO2) (L·minute-1, mL·kg-1·minute-1) and tidal volume and negatively correlated to VE/VO2and respiratory frequency. Height, upper-body endurance, and aerobic endurance were identified as the strongest predictors of WE (adjusted R2= 0.59, RMSE = 0.16). WE is a reliable and occupationally relevant method to assess FF performance because it accounts for work rate and air consumption. Firefighters may enhance WE through a training intervention focused on improving metabolic tolerance, upper-body endurance, and aerobic endurance.
KW - Exercise
KW - Firefighters
KW - Humans
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Respiration
KW - Respiratory Protective Devices
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85178495437
U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004577
DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004577
M3 - Article
C2 - 38015735
AN - SCOPUS:85178495437
SN - 1064-8011
VL - 37
SP - 2457
EP - 2466
JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
IS - 12
ER -