Evidence, Please? Rejoinder to “The Menace of Misinformation: Faculty Misstatements in Management Education and Their Consequences”

Steven Charlier, Robert C. Hoell, Curtis R. Sproul, Steven A. Stewart, Steven D. Charlier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this rejoinder, we provide a different perspective on the positions put forth by Giacalone and Promislo as they relate to (1) the claims of the pervasiveness of “misinformation” that is communicated by management faculty and (2) the proposition that management educators should teach in a nonideological fashion. Our position on these topics is that the pervasiveness of the misinformation problem in the focal article is unsubstantiated and not supported by data, and that it is impossible to effectively teach social science without at least acknowledging the impact of individual bias or ideology on all parties involved, including faculty. We present our rationale along with data gathered from a variety of current management textbooks to support our assertions.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Management Education
Volume43
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Keywords

  • capitalism
  • careers
  • ethics
  • ideology
  • life satisfaction
  • misinformation
  • rejoinder

DC Disciplines

  • Business Administration, Management, and Operations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence, Please? Rejoinder to “The Menace of Misinformation: Faculty Misstatements in Management Education and Their Consequences”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this