Examining the Effect of Perceived Responsibility On Online Bystander Intervention, Target Hardening, and Inaction

Leah C. Butler, Amanda Graham, Bonnie S. Fisher, Billy Henson, Bradford W. Reyns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Failure to take responsibility for intervening has been identified as a primary barrier to bystander intervention. Building on these findings, we examine how perceptions of responsibility affect responses to witnessing victimization in the online realm—a topic that has received limited attention. Using a maximum-likelihood selection model, we analyze data from the Pew American Trends Panel (N = 3709) to estimate the effects of respondents’ perceptions of the role different groups should play in addressing online harassment on their likelihood to engage in intervention, target hardening, or inaction in response to witnessing online harassment, conditioned upon their likelihood of having witnessed such behavior. Findings indicate that the greater role respondents believe online users should have in addressing online harassment, the more likely they are to intervene. (b =.310). The greater role respondents believe law enforcement or elected officials should have in addressing online harassment, the less likely they are to intervene (b = −.135 and −.072, respectively). These findings have implications for future efforts to curb online harassment through users’ crime prevention efforts.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2021

Keywords

  • Bystander Intervention
  • Crime Prevention
  • Online Victimization
  • Target Hardening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the Effect of Perceived Responsibility On Online Bystander Intervention, Target Hardening, and Inaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this