Expertise, Experience, and Ideology on Specialized Courts: The Case of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Banks Miller, Brett Curry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

What roles do prior expertise and accumulated experience play in shaping ideologically consistent voting on a specialized court? Using a dataset of obviousness patent cases from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit spanning 1997-2007, we show that prior expertise enhances the influence of ideology on judicial decisionmaking, but that accumulated experience does not. In addition, we build on previous work and show that ideology is a factor in decisionmaking in technical areas of law, contrary to the received wisdom on patent cases.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalLaw & Society Review
Volume43
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2009

DC Disciplines

  • American Politics
  • Political Science
  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Expertise, Experience, and Ideology on Specialized Courts: The Case of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this