TY - JOUR
T1 - Extending Buckley–James method for heteroscedastic survival data
AU - Yu, Lili
AU - Liu, Liang
AU - Chen, Ding Geng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The Buckley–James method for the classical accelerated failure time model has been extended to accommodate heteroscedastic survival data in two ways. The first is the weighted least squares method [Yu et al. Weighted least-squares method for right-censored data in accelerated failure time model. Biometrics. 2013;69:358–365], which estimates the heteroscedasticity nonparametrically, while the second is the local Buckley–James method [Pang et al. Local Buckley–James estimation for heteroscedastic accelerated failure time model. Stat Sin. 2015;25:863–877], which uses local Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the heteroscedasticity. However, no comparisons have been done for these two methods. Furthermore, there is no hypothesis testing procedure for this heteroscedastic accelerated failure time model. This paper is then aimed to fill these two gaps to compare the two methods theoretically and numerically with extensive simulation studies. In addition, we propose a class of hypothesis tests for the parameters to provide a complete procedure for analysing heteroscedastic survival data. Two real data examples are used for practical illustration of the comparison and the new proposed tests.
AB - The Buckley–James method for the classical accelerated failure time model has been extended to accommodate heteroscedastic survival data in two ways. The first is the weighted least squares method [Yu et al. Weighted least-squares method for right-censored data in accelerated failure time model. Biometrics. 2013;69:358–365], which estimates the heteroscedasticity nonparametrically, while the second is the local Buckley–James method [Pang et al. Local Buckley–James estimation for heteroscedastic accelerated failure time model. Stat Sin. 2015;25:863–877], which uses local Kaplan–Meier method to estimate the heteroscedasticity. However, no comparisons have been done for these two methods. Furthermore, there is no hypothesis testing procedure for this heteroscedastic accelerated failure time model. This paper is then aimed to fill these two gaps to compare the two methods theoretically and numerically with extensive simulation studies. In addition, we propose a class of hypothesis tests for the parameters to provide a complete procedure for analysing heteroscedastic survival data. Two real data examples are used for practical illustration of the comparison and the new proposed tests.
KW - Accelerated failure time model
KW - local Buckley–James method
KW - survival analysis
KW - weighted least squares method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85183024234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00949655.2024.2303349
DO - 10.1080/00949655.2024.2303349
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85183024234
SN - 0094-9655
VL - 94
SP - 1776
EP - 1792
JO - Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
JF - Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation
IS - 8
ER -