TY - JOUR
T1 - Financial Viability and Environmental Sustainability of Fecal Sludge Treatment with Pyrolysis Omni Processors
AU - Rowles, Lewis Stetson
AU - Morgan, Victoria L.
AU - Li, Yalin
AU - Zhang, Xinyi
AU - Watabe, Shion
AU - Stephen, Tyler
AU - Lohman, Hannah A.C.
AU - Desouza, Derek
AU - Hallowell, Jeff
AU - Cusick, Roland D.
AU - Guest, Jeremy S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03-0.08] USD·cap-1·d-1, while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08-0.14] USD·cap-1·d-1. Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3-23] kg CO2 eq·cap-1·yr-1, compared to 49 [28-77] kg CO2 eq·cap-1·yr-1 for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg-1 of CO2, the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps.
AB - Omni Processors (OPs) are community-scale systems for non-sewered fecal sludge treatment. These systems have demonstrated their capacity to treat excreta from tens of thousands of people using thermal treatment processes (e.g., pyrolysis), but their relative sustainability is unclear. In this study, QSDsan (an open-source Python package) was used to characterize the financial viability and environmental implications of fecal sludge treatment via pyrolysis-based OP technology treating mixed and source-separated human excreta and to elucidate the key drivers of system sustainability. Overall, the daily per capita cost for the treatment of mixed excreta (pit latrines) via the OP was estimated to be 0.05 [0.03-0.08] USD·cap-1·d-1, while the treatment of source-separated excreta (from urine-diverting dry toilets) was estimated to have a per capita cost of 0.09 [0.08-0.14] USD·cap-1·d-1. Operation and maintenance of the OP is a critical driver of total per capita cost, whereas the contribution from capital cost of the OP is much lower because it is distributed over a relatively large number of users (i.e., 12,000 people) for the system lifetime (i.e., 20 yr). The total emissions from the source-separated scenario were estimated to be 11 [8.3-23] kg CO2 eq·cap-1·yr-1, compared to 49 [28-77] kg CO2 eq·cap-1·yr-1 for mixed excreta. Both scenarios fall below the estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for anaerobic treatment of fecal sludge collected from pit latrines. Source-separation also creates opportunities for resource recovery to offset costs through nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration with biochar production. For example, when carbon is valued at 150 USD·Mg-1 of CO2, the per capita cost of sanitation can be further reduced by 44 and 40% for the source-separated and mixed excreta scenarios, respectively. Overall, our results demonstrate that pyrolysis-based OP technology can provide low-cost, low-GHG fecal sludge treatment while reducing global sanitation gaps.
KW - Omni Processor
KW - carbon sequestration
KW - fecal sludge management
KW - life cycle assessment (LCA)
KW - resource recovery
KW - sensitivity
KW - techno-economic analysis (TEA)
KW - uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136132034&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022
DO - 10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00022
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85136132034
SN - 2694-2518
JO - ACS Environmental Au
JF - ACS Environmental Au
ER -