Foreign Direct Investment in Russia's Regions 1993‐95. Why So Little and Where Has It Gone?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, foreign direct investment (FDI) into Russia's regions during the period 1993-95 is analysed using recently available regional data. Russia's regions are shown to be much richer than China's, but much poorer than US states, though with far less FDI than either country. FDI into the regions is also low compared to both Western and Eastern European countries, but has grown substantially from very low levels. Relatively higher FDI is found to occur when crime is lower, market size is bigger and risk is less. Surprisingly, the education of the workforce is found to be important only in the two major cities of St. Petersburg and Moscow, suggesting FDI into Russia's regions is not drawn by cheap labour. Unlike other countries, no evidence for either infrastructure or privatization influencing FDI could be found. The use of tax breaks and exemptions to attract FDI may be short-sighted as the consequent cut in budget revenues hampers the ability of the region to fight crime and to lower business risk, resulting in an implicit marginal tax increase for future foreign investors that exceeds any benefits from shortterm tax breaks.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalEconomics of Transition
Volume6
StatePublished - 1998

Keywords

  • FDI
  • Russia
  • regions

DC Disciplines

  • Growth and Development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Foreign Direct Investment in Russia's Regions 1993‐95. Why So Little and Where Has It Gone?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this