Abstract
In this paper, foreign direct investment (FDI) into Russia's regions during the period 1993-95 is analysed using recently available regional data. Russia's regions are shown to be much richer than China's, but much poorer than US states, though with far less FDI than either country. FDI into the regions is also low compared to both Western and Eastern European countries, but has grown substantially from very low levels. Relatively higher FDI is found to occur when crime is lower, market size is bigger and risk is less. Surprisingly, the education of the workforce is found to be important only in the two major cities of St. Petersburg and Moscow, suggesting FDI into Russia's regions is not drawn by cheap labour. Unlike other countries, no evidence for either infrastructure or privatization influencing FDI could be found. The use of tax breaks and exemptions to attract FDI may be short-sighted as the consequent cut in budget revenues hampers the ability of the region to fight crime and to lower business risk, resulting in an implicit marginal tax increase for future foreign investors that exceeds any benefits from short-term tax breaks.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 349-360 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Economics of Transition |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1998 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Scopus Subject Areas
- Economics and Econometrics
Keywords
- Foreign direct investment
- Investment
- Regional pattern
- Russian Federation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Foreign direct investment in Russia's regions 1993-95. Why so little and where has it gone?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver