Further Progress Toward Automating Functional Analysis Interpretation

Jonathan E. Friedel, Alison D. Cox, Sarah Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is considered best practice to conduct a functional analysis and visually inspect data collected to determine the function of problem behavior, which then informs the intervention approaches applied. Visual inspection has been described as a “subjective” process that may be affected by factors unrelated to the data. Structured decision-making guidelines have been established to address some of these shortcomings. The current paper is a follow-up to earlier work describing positive outcomes related to the viability of a decision support system based on structured criteria from Roane et al. Here, we demonstrate important improvements in a computer script’s interpretation of functional analysis data, including improvement in agreement between the updated computer script version and experienced human raters (89%) compared to our original agreement outcomes (81%). This paper further supports the use of decision support systems for functional analysis interpretation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-106
Number of pages32
JournalBehavior Modification
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • decision support systems
  • functional analysis
  • visual inspection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Further Progress Toward Automating Functional Analysis Interpretation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this