Abstract
It is considered best practice to conduct a functional analysis and visually inspect data collected to determine the function of problem behavior, which then informs the intervention approaches applied. Visual inspection has been described as a “subjective” process that may be affected by factors unrelated to the data. Structured decision-making guidelines have been established to address some of these shortcomings. The current paper is a follow-up to earlier work describing positive outcomes related to the viability of a decision support system based on structured criteria from Roane et al. Here, we demonstrate important improvements in a computer script’s interpretation of functional analysis data, including improvement in agreement between the updated computer script version and experienced human raters (89%) compared to our original agreement outcomes (81%). This paper further supports the use of decision support systems for functional analysis interpretation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 75-106 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Behavior Modification |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- decision support systems
- functional analysis
- visual inspection