How the Academy Looks at Marx is all Wrong, the Point However is to Change It

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In what follows, I note how two standard contemporary reference works describe Marx and then contrast those to Marx’s “auto-bibliography” which presents a different set of texts as important to the author’s self-conception. I then focus on one of the latter set of texts and suggest an approach to understanding Marx that emphasizes his identity as a revolutionary theorist and which, perhaps helps us better understand why he did not give priority to working out a theory of the state in a traditional theoretical manner. At the very least, I hope that this discussion will draw attention to the priority that Marx gave to his revolutionary commitment, a priority that may become neglected when Marxist thought and scholarship is detached from political practice.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalClass, Race and Corporate Power
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

DC Disciplines

  • Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How the Academy Looks at Marx is all Wrong, the Point However is to Change It'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this