I Like It, But Is It Good? Identifying Quality Writing

Peggy J. Lindsey, Jinrong Li

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Even when faculty clarify evaluation criteria through the use of rubrics, students often interpret and apply the criteria differently from faculty (Li and Lindsey, 2015). This can be particularly true for writing assignments. This presentation explores a new methodology for improving student understanding of quality writing across disciplines and genres. It describes initial findings of a mixed-method research study designed to test the efficacy of key word rubrics – rubrics that consist solely of essential descriptive terms rather than detailed criteria. The presenters will share preliminary data on the effectiveness of this methodology and its potential for application across disciplines.

Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - Mar 31 2017

Keywords

  • assessment
  • critical thinking
  • rubrics
  • student learning
  • writing

DC Disciplines

  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Education
  • Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
  • Educational Methods
  • Higher Education
  • Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'I Like It, But Is It Good? Identifying Quality Writing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this