Immigrant threat and national salience: Understanding the “English official” movement in the United States

Amy H. Liu, Anand Edward Sokhey, Joshua B. Kennedy, Annie Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The passage of (and debate over) immigration laws in Arizona highlights the increasing linguistic diversity of the US. To date, 31 states have passed an English-official bill. In this paper, we test several hypotheses concerning the adoption of such legislation across the states. Using data spanning the past three decades, we present event history models on the timing of adoption since the start of the modern movement in 1980. Like previous works, we find that the timing of adoption in states is structured by immigrant population and the initiative process. However, we find a conditional story that has been overlooked to date: the effects of immigrant threat only increase the likelihood of English-official legislation adoption when the issue of immigration is nationally salient
Original languageAmerican English
JournalResearch & Politics
Volume1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2014

Disciplines

  • American Politics
  • Political Science
  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

  • Language
  • immigration
  • state politics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Immigrant threat and national salience: Understanding the “English official” movement in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this