Improved Estimation of Youden Index and Associated Optimal Cut-off Point Under Different Sampling Schemes

Jingjing Yin, Hani Samawi, Daniel F. Linder

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

Abstract

Diagnostic cut-off point of biomarker measurements is needed for classifying a random subject to be either diseased or healthy. However, such cut-off point is usually unknown and needs to be estimated by some optimization criteria, among which, Youden index has been widely adopted in practice. Youden index, defined as max (sensitivity + specificity -1), directly measures the largest total diagnostic accuracy a biomarker can achieve. Therefore, it is desirable to esti-mate the optimal cut-off point associated with Youden index. Sometimes, taking the actual measurements of a biomarker is very difficult and expensive, while rank-ing them without actual measurements can be easy. In such cases, ranked set sampling would give more accurate estimation than simple random sampling, since ranked set samples are more likely to span the full range of population (thus is more representative). In this study, kernel density estimation is utilized to numerically solve for the nonparametric estimate of the optimal cut-off point. Intensive simulations are carried out to compare the proposed method using ranked set samples with the one using simple random samples and the pro-posed method outperforms universally with much smaller mean squared error (MSE). A real data set is analyzed for illustrating the proposed method.

Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - Mar 15 2015
EventEastern North American Region Annual Conference (ENAR) -
Duration: Mar 15 2015 → …

Conference

ConferenceEastern North American Region Annual Conference (ENAR)
Period03/15/15 → …

Disciplines

  • Biostatistics
  • Public Health

Keywords

  • Estimation
  • Youden Index
  • Optimal cut-off point
  • Sampling schemes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved Estimation of Youden Index and Associated Optimal Cut-off Point Under Different Sampling Schemes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this