Influence of contralateral noise stimulation on wave I of the ABR, elicited with condensation and rarefaction clicks in humans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sound‐evoked efferent effects can be examined by comparing the response amplitudes of the auditory nerve with and without contralateral stimulation. It has been suggested that the efferent system modifies the mechanical characteristics of the cochlear partition by varying outer hair cell tonus and regulating the mean position of the basilar membrane [E. L. LePage, Hear. Res. 38, 177–198 (1989)]. If this is the case, the effect of contralateral stimulation may be different for responses elicited with clicks of opposite polarity (condensation versus rarefaction), as such stimuli cause initial movement of the basilar membrane either toward scala tympani or scala vestibuli. Furthermore, such stimuli are known to elicit dissimilar ABR waveforms [V. Rawool and S. Zerlin, Stand. Audiol. 17 (1988)]. Results of the surface recorded wave of the ABR obtained from human subjects, with and without contralateral noise, for rarefaction and condensation clicks as well as the possible underlying mechanisms will be presented.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberS143
JournalThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume87
Issue numberS1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1990

Keywords

  • Auditory system
  • Wave mechanics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of contralateral noise stimulation on wave I of the ABR, elicited with condensation and rarefaction clicks in humans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this