Instrumentalism in the Land of Opportunity: Socioeconomic Causes and Emotional Consequences

Marieke Van Willigen, John Mirowsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between the sense of control over one's own life and the belief that most Americans control their lives and create their own good or bad outcomes. We analyze the effects of four aspects of stratification: an ascribed status (race), achieved statuses of differing stability (education and household income). and recent economic hardship (trouble paying bills or buying necessities). Using data from a 1990 survey of 2,031 Americans, we find that the large majority hold instrumental views of themselves and of other Americans. Socioeconomic status strengthens both views, although education and income increase the belief that one controls one's own life more than the belief that other Americans control theirs. Each belief also appears to generalize to the other. Finally, the Americans who feel that they have little control over their own lives apparently take heart from the belief that most Americans can achieve what they set their minds to, that most people's problems result from their bad decisions and lack of effort, and that the succes or failure of others was more than luck. Either a firm sense of personal control or (when that is weak) a firm belief in American instrumentalism minimizes depression. We see no sign that blaming outcomes on chance, circumstance, or other makes Americans feel better.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalSocial Psychology Quarterly
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996

Keywords

  • Depressive disorders
  • Economic depressions
  • Economic hardship
  • Economic models
  • Emotional states
  • Fatalism
  • Instrumentalism
  • Social behavior
  • Socioeconomic status

DC Disciplines

  • Anthropology
  • Sociology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Instrumentalism in the Land of Opportunity: Socioeconomic Causes and Emotional Consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this