Leaching of Heavy Metals from Farmland Soil in China: The Status and Ecological Risk Assessment

  • Na Mi
  • , Yuanyuan Lu
  • , Zhen Song
  • , Feng Sheng
  • , Yun Chen
  • , Zhanghao Chen
  • , Jianzhou He
  • , Tingting Fan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, using the leaching models, we quantified the leaching content of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Zn, and estimated the ecological risk changes in farmland soil caused by leaching and the ecological risk in leachate in China. Jiangxi, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan, Hunan, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Chongqing are hotspot areas. The leaching of Cd in these regions exceed reported mean values in Europe (2.56 g ha−1 year−1). Although the total ecological risk of heavy metals in the soil of various provinces (ranged from 20 to 130) was generally low, Cd was the most important contributor to ecological risks, while 9 provinces exhibited considerable ecological risk from Cd. The calculated Cd, Pb, and Zn in leachate exceed drinking water standards (GB 5749-2022) in five provinces. Overall, the leaching of heavy metals in Chinese agricultural soils, particularly in the southern regions, is a critical issue that warrants attention. Soil pH is the most prominent factor influencing heavy metal leaching. A 5% increase in pH reduces leaching by 31.2% for Cd, 25.42% for Pb, 22.07% for Cu, and 38.37% for Zn. Adjusting the pH to 6 can effectively solve the problem of excessive heavy metal content in leachate in most areas. The study recommends prioritizing groundwater monitoring in critical provinces such as Jiangxi and adjusting the soil pH of farmland in key regions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2126
JournalAgronomy
Volume15
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 5 2025
Externally publishedYes

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Keywords

  • ecological risk
  • farmland soils
  • heavy metals
  • leaching

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leaching of Heavy Metals from Farmland Soil in China: The Status and Ecological Risk Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this