Legal Entrepreneurship and the Strategic Virtues of Legal Uncertainty

Justin W. Evans, Anthony L. Gabel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The field of law and strategy (LAS) has advanced our understanding of the law's role in competitive advantage. To date, however, LAS has neglected low rule of law environments—countries characterized by expansive degrees of legal uncertainty. LAS should account for these settings, too, since environmental uncertainty is a strategically significant factor for any company. This article situates the strategic relevance of legal uncertainty in the Chinese context and fills an important gap by illustrating how LAS principles apply in low rule of law jurisdictions. Specifically, this article develops the construct of legal entrepreneurship—the notion that attorneys may apply an entrepreneurial mind-set and skill set to position the client favorably and legitimately within the uncertainties of the legal landscape, thereby creating legal competitive advantages for the client. Drawing upon interviews with expert attorneys and executives, this article presents a typology of legal strategies available to U.S. companies in China, uniquely modeling these approaches along the two fundamental dimensions of legal strategy. Additionally, this article identifies two basic types of legal uncertainty in the cross-border context and offers guidelines for the exercise of legal entrepreneurship. Together, these arguments demonstrate that legal entrepreneurship is an empirically viable construct within the LAS project. In low rule of law jurisdictions that have embraced foreign enterprise, legal entrepreneurship will generally optimize the American company's pursuit of both legal value creation and legal risk management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)593-646
Number of pages54
JournalAmerican Business Law Journal
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Entrepreneurship and the Strategic Virtues of Legal Uncertainty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this