Abstract
The process-based model of policing or procedural justice theory promises a host of positive outcomes as a result of law enforcement officers using procedural justice in their encounters with community members - that is, treating community members with dignity and respect, being viewed as neutral and trustworthy, and providing community members a voice during encounters. Evidence surrounding the link between the use of procedural justice by police and the enhancement of police legitimacy is robust, as is the link between legitimacy and cooperation/compliance. However, mixed evidence in these relationships provides a cautionary note worth heeding. As such, this chapter briefly outlines the evidence related to these relationships. Next, it provides a cautionary discussion as to why mixed evidence may exist, including continuing debates on the conceptualization, operationalization, and measurement of key constructs. Finally, this chapter closes with future directions for research to help enhance our understanding of procedural justice theory.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Understanding Legitimacy in Criminal Justice |
| Subtitle of host publication | Conceptual and Measurement Challenges |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 19-37 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031177316 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783031177309 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2022 |
Keywords
- Conceptualization
- Definition
- Future directions
- Operationalization
- Procedural justice theory