TY - GEN
T1 - Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Coal and Biomass Co-Fired Power Plant With Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies
AU - Sarkar, Surja
AU - Bhoi, Prakash
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 by ASME.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - One of the global concerns that have received a lot of attention recently is climate change. Coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases constitute the majority of the fuel used to generate utility-scale electricity in the US. Global warming is a result of widespread emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2, from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, due to their lower carbon footprint, biomass-based heat and power generation are expanding quickly, aiding in the achievement of the target of zero carbon emissions. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of a 100 MW subcritical waste coal and biomass co-fired power plant with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies has been assessed considering raw material extraction, transportation, power generation, and associated inputs and outputs. The findings demonstrate that increasing the biomass ratio reduced global warming potential (GWP), and incorporating CCS further decreased the GWP. However, higher biomass ratios and CCS integration led to increased eutrophication, ozone layer depletion, acidification, and other impact potentials.
AB - One of the global concerns that have received a lot of attention recently is climate change. Coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases constitute the majority of the fuel used to generate utility-scale electricity in the US. Global warming is a result of widespread emissions of greenhouse gases, particularly CO2, from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, due to their lower carbon footprint, biomass-based heat and power generation are expanding quickly, aiding in the achievement of the target of zero carbon emissions. In this study, the life cycle assessment (LCA) of a 100 MW subcritical waste coal and biomass co-fired power plant with and without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies has been assessed considering raw material extraction, transportation, power generation, and associated inputs and outputs. The findings demonstrate that increasing the biomass ratio reduced global warming potential (GWP), and incorporating CCS further decreased the GWP. However, higher biomass ratios and CCS integration led to increased eutrophication, ozone layer depletion, acidification, and other impact potentials.
KW - Biomass cofiring
KW - Carbon capture storage
KW - Life cycle assessment
KW - Waste coal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185540245&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/IMECE2023-112790
DO - 10.1115/IMECE2023-112790
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85185540245
T3 - ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)
BT - Energy
PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
T2 - ASME 2023 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE 2023
Y2 - 29 October 2023 through 2 November 2023
ER -