Social Capital and Resource Dependence Theory as Frameworks to Understand Resource Mobilization Through Supplier Satisfaction

Holger Schiele, Scott C. Ellis, Michael Essig, John W. Henke, Thomas J. Kull

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Recently, supplier satisfaction has gained more attention both in practice and in academic research. However, the knowledge accumulation process is still in an embryonic and explorative phase. Likewise, supplier satisfaction measuring in practice may still benefit from an impetus from academia to be more widely used. This paper aims at considerably expanding understanding of supplier satisfaction by proposing to apply a social capital and a resource dependence theory perspective. We expect an abundance of social capital in a relationship to relate positively to supplier satisfaction, whilst power disequilibrium and dependence from the buyer are expected to negatively relate to supplier satisfaction. It is worth highlighting that, according to research rooted in Hofstede's cultural dimensions model, the perception and acceptance of power differences resulting from a situation of dependency is highly culture specific. We therefore further hypothesize that supplier satisfaction will be moderated by cultural differences and ask researchers to take the cultural dimension into account.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalAustralian Marketing Journal
Volume23
DOIs
StatePublished - May 19 2015

Keywords

  • Cultural differences
  • Resource dependence theory
  • Resource mobilisation
  • Social capital
  • Supplier satisfaction

DC Disciplines

  • Business

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social Capital and Resource Dependence Theory as Frameworks to Understand Resource Mobilization Through Supplier Satisfaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this