Multiple Text Comprehension for College-Level Readers: Instructions to Enhance Performance

Tracy Linderholm, Heekyung Kwon, David J. Therriault

Research output: Contribution to conferencePresentation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal method for instructing college-level readers how to use a self-explanation strategy when comprehending multiple texts, which is a difficult task even for advanced readers. Self-explanation has been well documented to enhance single text comprehension. Three experimental conditions tested the degree of explicitness necessary for pre-reading instructions to make an impact: a control condition where readers were instructed to comprehend texts well; a definition only condition where readers were given a definition of a self-explanation strategy and urged to use it during reading; and a definition plus modeling condition where readers were given the self-explanation definition and then a researcher modeled how to use it during reading. The results showed that college-level readers performed better on reading comprehension and written essay tasks when in the definition only condition compared to the control condition. It is concluded that college-level readers need instructions to self-explain to enhance multiple text comprehension but instructions do not need to be overly explicit in terms of how to implement the strategy during reading.
Original languageAmerican English
StatePublished - Jul 18 2014
EventSociety for the Scientific Studies of Reading Conference (SSSR) - Santa Fe, NM
Duration: Jul 18 2014 → …

Conference

ConferenceSociety for the Scientific Studies of Reading Conference (SSSR)
Period07/18/14 → …

Keywords

  • Learning
  • Multiple Text Comprehension
  • Reading comprehension
  • Reading instruction

DC Disciplines

  • Curriculum and Instruction
  • Curriculum and Social Inquiry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple Text Comprehension for College-Level Readers: Instructions to Enhance Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this