Online Writing Labs (OWLs): A taxonomy of options and issues

Muriel Harris, Michael Pemberton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

As increasing numbers of writing centers consider instituting Online Writing Labs (OWLs) as adjuncts to existing tutorial services, careful planning decisions must be made about the nature, purpose, and feasibility of online offerings. In this article, we offer an overview and schema for understanding some of the most frequently used network technologies available for OWLs-e-mail, Gopher, Worldwide Web (WWW), newsgroups, synchronous chat systems, and automated file retrieval (AFR) systems. We also consider ways in which writing centers' choices among these technologies are impacted by such factors as user access, network security, computer illiteracy, institutional missions, writing center goals, computing center priorities, and computer programmers' attitudes. Successful OWLs, we believe, are those which navigate institutional and technological constraints while still managing to enhance the services provided writers and to uphold pedagogical goals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-159
Number of pages15
JournalComputers and Composition
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Keywords

  • computers in writing centers
  • cyberspace writing centers
  • electronic writing services
  • Internet resources in writing centers
  • online writing centers Online Writing Lab (OWL)
  • tutoring online

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Online Writing Labs (OWLs): A taxonomy of options and issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this