Perceived sanction threats, gender, and crime: A test and elaboration of power-control theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research addresses the need to incorporate the perceived threats of informal sanctions, specifically, shame and embarrassment, into the power-control model. First, the possibility that gender differences exist in the perceived threats of shame and embarrassment, as well as legal sanctions, and that these differences vary between more patriarchal and less patriarachal households of origin is explored. Second, the relative impact of the informal sanction threat variables compared with the formal legal sanctions is ascertained. Results indicate that significant gender differences exist in the perceived threats of embarrassment and formal sanctions, and that these differences vary by household of origin type. In addition, among those individuals reared in more patriarachal households, the perceived threat of shame accounts for a significant proportion of the gender-crime relationship.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-488
Number of pages50
JournalCriminology
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2000

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Perceived sanction threats, gender, and crime: A test and elaboration of power-control theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this